曲星宇, 曾鹏, 李俊鹏. 基于RNN-LSTM的磨矿系统故障诊断技术[J]. 信息与控制, 2019, 48(2): 179-186. DOI: 10.13976/j.cnki.xk.2019.8365
引用本文: 曲星宇, 曾鹏, 李俊鹏. 基于RNN-LSTM的磨矿系统故障诊断技术[J]. 信息与控制, 2019, 48(2): 179-186. DOI: 10.13976/j.cnki.xk.2019.8365
QU Xingyu, ZENG Peng, LI Junpeng. Fault Diagnosis Technology of Grinding System Based on RNN-LSTM[J]. INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 2019, 48(2): 179-186. DOI: 10.13976/j.cnki.xk.2019.8365
Citation: QU Xingyu, ZENG Peng, LI Junpeng. Fault Diagnosis Technology of Grinding System Based on RNN-LSTM[J]. INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 2019, 48(2): 179-186. DOI: 10.13976/j.cnki.xk.2019.8365

基于RNN-LSTM的磨矿系统故障诊断技术

Fault Diagnosis Technology of Grinding System Based on RNN-LSTM

  • 摘要: 目前磨矿系统故障诊断多为人为判断,效率低、准确率低、成本高且容易造成人员伤亡.传统方法对高维度和时间相关性较大的样本数据集分类能力较差,针对以上问题,提出一种基于RNN-LSTM(Recurrent Neural Network-Long Short-Term Memory)的深度学习方法,实现磨矿系统故障的智能化诊断.该方法通过将数据集"分批处理"分别输入到LSTM单元网络中,提取数据集在时间维度上的相关性,并比较分析前后时刻的输入特征向量实现对故障分类.通过分别对RNN-LSTM深度学习网络与基于自编码分类方法进行实验对比验证,得出结论:在时间相关性较强的高维度数据集中基于RNN-LSTM深度方法辨识效果明显优于基于自编码方法的分类器,最终网络对于故障诊断的错误率低至3%.

     

    Abstract: At present, the fault diagnosis of grinding systems is evaluated by humans, which easily causes low efficiency, low accuracy, high cost, and casualties. The classification ability of the traditional method is considered unsatisfactory for sample datasets with high dimension and high temporal correlation. Considering the above problems, a deep learning method based on recurrent neural network and long short term memory (RNN-LSTM) and that realizes the intelligent fault diagnosis of grinding systems is proposed. The dataset is batche for inputs of LSTM networks, and the temporal correlation of the dataset is extracted, which is then used to complete the fault classification by comparing input feature vectors before and after the moment. We compare RNN-LSTM-based networks and autoencoder-based networks via a simulation. The RNN-LSTM-based method significantly outperformed the autoencoder-based method for a dataset with high dimension and high temporal correlation, and the result of the error rate is as low as 3%.

     

/

返回文章
返回